1 Mohamed Bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Abu Dhabi, UAE 2 New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Do 3D medical VLMs truly understand volumetric space — or do they rely on language priors? We introduce CT-SpatialVQA, a benchmark of 9,077 clinically grounded QA pairs from 1,601 CT volumes that demands explicit spatial reasoning. Eight state-of-the-art models average only 34% accuracy, often below random chance, revealing a critical gap between linguistic fluency and volumetric spatial understanding.
9,077 spatially grounded QA pairs from 1,601 CT volumes with 95% human consensus
LLM-based generation, independent validation, and medical human auditing across 6 spatial dimensions
8 medical VLMs benchmarked with LLM-as-Jury and text metrics, revealing consistent failure modes
Example. A CT scan, its paired radiology report, and representative spatially-grounded QA pairs.
Spatial reasoning failures. All three models answer incorrectly on spatially grounded questions despite varying question types.
A single CT volume shown across all three anatomical planes:
Axial
Coronal
Sagittal
| Metric | CT-Chat | MERLIN | Med3DVLM | M3D | RadFM | VILA-M3 | MedGemma | MedEvalKit | Avg. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LLM-based Evaluation (Accuracy %) | |||||||||
| LLM as Judge (Gemini) | 44.68 | 29.85 | 34.55 | 33.04 | 33.36 | 29.49 | 39.30 | 39.96 | 35.53 |
| LLM as Judge (GPT) | 41.50 | 29.45 | 31.82 | 31.09 | 31.40 | 28.43 | 40.55 | 39.44 | 34.21 |
| LLM as Judge (Qwen) | 45.27 | 30.34 | 32.20 | 31.21 | 32.09 | 27.81 | 37.33 | 41.89 | 34.79 |
| LLM as Jury | 43.69 | 28.85 | 31.44 | 30.57 | 31.49 | 28.20 | 38.24 | 40.16 | 34.08 |
| Text Similarity Metrics | |||||||||
| SBERT Cosine Sim. | 0.562 | 0.503 | 0.399 | 0.412 | 0.585 | 0.471 | 0.581 | 0.579 | 0.512 |
| BLEU | 3.29 | 8.11 | 0.56 | 1.08 | 16.45 | 2.51 | 3.07 | 3.46 | 4.82 |
| ROUGE-L | 0.130 | 0.300 | 0.198 | 0.204 | 0.372 | 0.273 | 0.167 | 0.158 | 0.225 |
| METEOR | 0.230 | 0.256 | 0.068 | 0.077 | 0.311 | 0.114 | 0.237 | 0.252 | 0.193 |
Category-level performance (LLM-as-Jury). Sharpest drops in vertical and depth-oriented reasoning.
Answer length distribution. Questions, ground-truth answers, and model predictions across all 8 VLMs.